As we look down the road at solving the challenges faced in our current health system, we must ask what can be some of the solutions that will resolve the dilemma we face? Can it be improved access to providers by offering telemedicine access to patients? Improving communication between health care entities by seeking better interoperability between EMRs? Striving to achieve continual advances aimed at improving the safety and quality of care for people across the continuum? It is actually each of those endeavors, but may also include another intervention that is often overlooked when speaking about reform. It is the leadership necessary to successfully achieve the outcomes for health care reform.
Each of us has been exposed to various leadership types throughout our professional lives that has either created negative or positive effects for us. Whether it was the little league coach who taught what was needed to win the t-ball trophy when you were a kid, or an executive who led you and a team of professionals to deliver a new innovative solution that could change the world. None of these ventures could be possible without the type of leadership that acts as a rudder in leading a team to achieving success. As we head into the storm of health care reform we need a presence at the helm that can be successful in leading teams to the common goal of providing care for all Americans. With such an important task at hand it is imperative to choose leaders who can inspire and mobilize others to action.
Throughout our history people have been attending business schools, joining military academies, and playing on sports teams to cultivate the skills necessary to become the leaders of our society. In each of these organizations specific leadership styles are studied that have been proven to be effective in achieving results. Here are some of the most common types of leadership styles:
According to the book, Leadership and the One Minute Manager (Blanchard, Zigarmi, and Zigarmi. New York: William Morrow and Company, 1985), there are 4 common leadership styles used to move teams to action:
In the Harvard Business Review, the 2000 article Leadership That Gets Results, Daniel Goleman outlined six leadership styles he felt were most commonly used in the workplace.
According to the book, Leadership and the One Minute Manager (Blanchard, Zigarmi, and Zigarmi. New York: William Morrow and Company, 1985), there are 4 common leadership styles used to move teams to action:
- Directing: This style uses high directive and low supportive behavior and is best matched to the D1 (low competence and high commitment).
- Coaching: Uses high directive and high supportive behavior and is best matched to D2 (low to some competence and low commitment).
- Supporting: This has has highly supportive and low directive behavior, it is best matched to D3 (moderate to high competence and variable commitment).
- Delegating: This style combines low supportive and directive behavior and it's best for D4 (high commitment and high competence)Directive behavior is described as giving direction and feedback. It can range from low to high depending on the developmental level of the person it is aimed at. Supportive behavior on the other hand is more about encouragement and motivation to boost confidence.
In the Harvard Business Review, the 2000 article Leadership That Gets Results, Daniel Goleman outlined six leadership styles he felt were most commonly used in the workplace.
- Coercive Style - Demands immediate compliance.
- Authoritative - Mobilizes people toward a common vision.
- Affiliative - Creates harmony and builds emotional bonds.
- Democratic - Forges consensus through participation.
- Pace setting - Sets high standards for performance.
- Coaching - Develops people for their future.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for visiting. I would love to hear your thoughts. Take care, Dave.